The undead are everywhere these days - vampires are all over television, movie screens, and book covers. Zombies are having a moment in the sun, as it were, too. Jane Austen got ravaged by a zombie hoard, as did America in Zombieland. As someone who read Anne Rice's Vampire Chronicles at a probably too young age and who was an early fan of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, I get the appeal of vampires. It's sex, right? I mean, yes, good vs. evil, etc. But when it boils down to it, vampires are about sex. But I never really got zombies.
Now, having recently finished reading Pride and Prejudice and Zombies and recently seen Zombieland, I think I get it. Zombies seem to be about gore. I might be missing something, as I am not well versed in zombie fiction. In fact, I think the first real zombie movie I've ever seen was Shaun of the Dead, but it remains my favorite. All three of these examples also deal with the silliness of the undead. Sure they are trying to eat your brains, but zombies are pretty silly with their shuffled walking and moaning. And maybe zombies are just a way of giving humans an opportunity to kick some ass.
I enjoyed Pride and Prejudice and Zombies, although it was pretty silly in and of itself. In this alternate reality, the Bennett girls have been trained in the deadly arts by their father and even went to China to train. (Although this shows their social status, as the true elite go to Japan to study - something Elizabeth is derided for throughout the book.) I especially liked the slow demise of poor Charlotte, and the understandable way that throughout the story people would politely vomit into handkerchiefs and napkins. It was never explained, but I assumed that with the undead about, good society will ignore the occasional queasiness.
I also thought Zombieland was good fun. Gory, yes, but funny and entertaining. The characters are known by their hometowns, and everyone in the theater shouted with glee when Jesse Eisenberg's character said he was from Columbus, Ohio (where we were all watching it). Of course, the feeling was slightly different when we heard our hometown's fate. I really like Eisenberg as an actor, but I felt like some of the early scenes were written for Michael Cera. Last month, Gawker joked about who the next "hoodie heartthrob" would be after Cera, and from some of this movie I can see why. I think I am not alone in getting tired of seeing stereotypical Michael Cera characters.
All in all, though, Zombieland is a fun ride, even if there isn't much of a plot. I liked Columbus's rules for surviving zombies and they were a nice line that connected everything. Woody Harrelson is great and the cameo by Bill Murray is hilarious. It seems he has yet to outstay his welcome.
Did you see this piece in Salon? Apparently Max Brooks' stance on the matter is old, but since I get all my new from Salon headlines and Wait, Wait, Don't Tell Me, I am often behind the curve...
Posted by: Eliza | October 12, 2009 at 04:53 PM
As a zombie fan, I thought I would add my two cents. Zombies represent those who follow the herd, consume without thinking, have high levels of need for indulgence (BRAAAAAAAIIIIIIINS), do not think think for themselves. Individuals, people with personalities, are the ones who survive (or last the longest). As for zombie literature, I would recommend The Living Dead, an anthology edited by JJ Adams. You know its good when it includes Kelly Link as one of the authors.
Posted by: Shana | October 13, 2009 at 05:40 PM
Shana I am so glad you weighed in - I was hoping you would. And of course! The masses! Those following sheep! Why didn't I get that?
And Eliza, I love that one of your two news sources is Wait, Wait. It could be worse. :) Oh, and thanks for reminding me about the zombie modeling - I meant to include that in this post.
Posted by: Claire | October 13, 2009 at 06:09 PM